Evaluation of software trustworthiness

Download preview PDF. Skip to main content. This service is more advanced with JavaScript available. Advertisement Hide. International Conference on Trustworthy Computing and Services. Software Trustworthiness: Past, Present and Future. Conference paper. Keywords software trustworthiness quality security. This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Nami, M. Rolland, C. Bordeleau, F. Leue, S. In: Proc. Whittle, J. Eur J Oper Res 1 : — Rao RV, Patel BK A subjective and objective integrated multiple attribute decision making method for material selection.

Mater Des 31 10 : — Knowledge and information systems. In: International conference on computer science and information technology, pp — Steffen B, Wihelm H, Alexandra P et al Trustworthy software systems: a discussion of basic concepts and terminology. Google Scholar.

Knowl Inf Syst 25 1 : — Tokuno K, Yamada S Relationship between software availability measurement and the number of restorations with imperfect debugging. Comput Math Appl 46 7 : — Uzunov K, Nguyen T Dependability of software in airborne mission systems.

Softw Qual J 11 1 : 9— Voas J, Payne J Dependability certification of software components. J Syst Softw 52 2 : — Expert Syst Appl 36 5 : — Water JG Software dependability evaluation based on Markov usage models.

Perform Eval 40 4 : — Knowl Inf Syst 25 3 : — Commun ACM 49 5 : 93— Yager RR Entropy and specificity in a mathematical theory of evidence. Int J Gen Syst 9 4 : — Yang JB Rule and utility based evidential reasoning approach for multi-attribute decision under uncertainties. Eur J Oper Res 1 : 31— Wuhan University J Nat Sci 13 5 : — Download references.

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar. Based on improved trustworthy software triangle model, a single evidence item is analyzed to decide that it contributes only to one single trustworthy attribute or to multiple trustworthy attributes. After that, the evidence group is used as an individual layer between evidence level and trustworthy attribute level.

Finally, the quantitive evaluation to software trustworthy level is done from the evidence layer in the bottom to the evaluation level in the top. AHP is used to set the weight. The proposed evaluation model balances the complexity of theory and convenience of operation effectively.

The layered AHP is easy to realize in the model. In order to analyze the model performance, a kind of software system is used as object in the simulating experiments. Experimental results show that the proposed model can evaluate the software system effectively. Request Permissions. Trustie Series Technology Standard V2. Jeffrey: Trusted Software's Holy Grail.

Software Quality Journal, Vol. Journal of Software, Vol.